Re: [PATCH] [7/8] CPA: Don't flush caches on CPUs that support self-snoop

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <tglx@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 1:36 pm

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:23PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

BTW, making pages not present is required only while changing the attribute
from WB to WC or WC to WB. I think this step is for avoiding attribute aliasing
for speculative accesses. For UC, we don't have speculative accesses and such we
probably don't need it.

So WC support through PAT should take care of it.


True. Perhaps for WC chages we can assume the ownership?

thanks,
suresh
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] [0/8] Misc CPA patchkit, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 11, 5:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] [7/8] CPA: Don't flush caches on CPUs that suppo..., Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 11, 11:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] [7/8] CPA: Don't flush caches on CPUs that suppo..., Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 11, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] [7/8] CPA: Don't flush caches on CPUs that suppo..., Siddha, Suresh B, (Mon Feb 11, 1:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [6/8] CPA: Remove BUG_ON for LRU/Compound pages, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Feb 17, 10:07 am)
[PATCH] [1/8] CPA: Remove my copyright notice, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 11, 5:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] [1/8] CPA: Remove my copyright notice, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Feb 11, 8:42 pm)