Re: [PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 1:35 pm

On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:

I suppose the list would be corrupted only if there are deletions from
the list? (Which there aren't.)

Anyway not adding the empty strings is way better and I don't see now
how they could've been useful.
(I added them out of the doubt of breaking something.)

Acked-By: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>

Thanks

Parag
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption, Jean Delvare, (Mon Feb 11, 1:22 pm)
[PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent), Jean Delvare, (Mon Feb 11, 1:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent), Parag Warudkar, (Mon Feb 11, 1:35 pm)