Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » February » 11

Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Subject: Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent?
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 9:42 am

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:23:33PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:

I don't think it is.  The memories are fading, so I don't recall why it
is we do it this way, but I'm pretty sure it's correct the way it is.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_ ..., Roel Kluin, (Mon Feb 11, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Mon Feb 11, 9:42 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., James Bottomley, (Mon Feb 11, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., Roel Kluin, (Mon Feb 11, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., James Bottomley, (Mon Feb 11, 9:55 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., Roel Kluin, (Mon Feb 11, 9:57 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_o ..., John David Anglin, (Mon Feb 11, 10:08 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_o ..., Roel Kluin, (Mon Feb 11, 11:56 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., Kyle McMartin, (Mon Feb 11, 11:58 am)
Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.al ..., Kyle McMartin, (Mon Feb 11, 12:10 pm)