Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andy Whitcroft
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 3:23 am

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:33:02PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote:

Yep the code is clearly correct.  Can I have the whole patch fragment
you got these against so I can figure out why we are unable to detect
these two as types, I would expect us to have done so.  Also what
version of checkpatch is this?  There is a version string at the top.

-apw
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Marcin Slusarz, (Sun Feb 10, 7:33 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Andy Whitcroft, (Mon Feb 11, 3:23 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Benny Halevy, (Mon Feb 11, 9:05 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Andy Whitcroft, (Mon Feb 11, 9:40 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Benny Halevy, (Mon Feb 11, 9:58 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Feb 11, 11:09 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Andy Whitcroft, (Mon Feb 11, 11:42 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Benny Halevy, (Tue Feb 12, 1:21 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Feb 13, 12:43 pm)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Andy Whitcroft, (Thu Feb 14, 3:06 am)
Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?), Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Feb 14, 11:29 am)