On Sunday 10 February 2008 23:53, Greg KH wrote:No amount of information about such a thing is too much information. We do not need to do any more, but we can do more. It is news, how about an entry in the kernel.org news section? How about a security alerts section on kernel.org? There is a lot that can be done to support people who want to patch their kernels as quickly as possible. Regards, Daniel --
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| monstr | Microblaze init port |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Back to the future. |
git: | |
| Petr Baudis | Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts |
| Jan Engelhardt | about c8af1de9 (git status uses pager) |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Khalid Schofield | Configuring sendmail openbsd 4.2 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Johannes Berg | [RFC v2] mac80211: assign needed_headroom/tailroom for netdevs |
| Francois Romieu | Re: NAPI, rx_no_buffer_count, e1000, r8169 and other actors |
