On Sunday 10 February 2008 23:49, Pekka Enberg wrote:You did your part flawlessly as far as I can see. Really, your original subject line was accurate, and lkml should not be the place to go to find the patch, but it is. And they are no doubt getting kernel revs out at this very moment, that part of the machine works great. It is just the part about getting out information to users who want to patch their own kernels that could be done better. Regards, Daniel --
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Cliffe | Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11141] no battery or DC status - Dell i1501 |
git: | |
| James | git push refspec problem |
| Martin Langhoff | Re: pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Nigel Magnay | Re: crlf with git-svn driving me nuts... |
| Elijah Newren | Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolet... |
| Leonardo Rodrigues | Does anyone know a good file manager for OpenBSD? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing |
| carlopmart | About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Staal WJ | Re: mount nfs fails after 4.4.1 |
| Jeffery K Hoffman -- Personal Account | FDISK |
| Dave `geek' Gymer | WARNING (was Re: New afio release) |
