login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
10
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...>
To: Greg KH <greg@...>
Cc: Bastian Blank <bastian@...>, Niki Denev <ndenev@...>, Willy Tarreau <w@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <stable@...>
Subject:
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit
Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 - 1:48 pm
thanks the info On 2/10/08, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote: > > thx it fixed for 2.6.22 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > commit f6e993b835393543bab2d917f9dea75218473edd > > Author: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> > > Date: Sun Feb 10 14:03:46 2008 +0100 > > > > [PATCH] vm: splice local root exploit fix for 2.6.22.y > > > > Based on Bastian Blank's patch > > > > Fix for CVE_2008_0009 and CVE_2008-0010 > > > > ----->8----- > > > > oliver@pancs:/tmp$ ./2617_26241_root_exploit > > ----------------------------------- > > Linux vmsplice Local Root Exploit > > By qaaz > > ----------------------------------- > > [+] mmap: 0x0 .. 0x1000 > > [+] page: 0x0 > > [+] page: 0x20 > > [+] mmap: 0x4000 .. 0x5000 > > [+] page: 0x4000 > > [+] page: 0x4020 > > [+] mmap: 0x1000 .. 0x2000 > > [+] page: 0x1000 > > [+] mmap: 0xb7f1a000 .. 0xb7f4c000 > > [-] vmsplice: Bad address > > > > -----8<----- > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> > > > > diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c > > index e263d3b..d8b106e 100644 > > --- a/fs/splice.c > > +++ b/fs/splice.c > > @@ -1182,6 +1182,12 @@ static int get_iovec_page_array(const struct > > iovec __user *iov, > > if (unlikely(!base)) > > break; > > > > + /* CVE-2008-0009, CVE-2008-0010 fix */ > > No, this is a different CVE, as it is a different problem from the > original 09 and 10 report. > > It has been given CVE-2008-0600 to address this issue (09 and 10 only > affect .23 and .24 kernels, and have been fixed.) > > > + if(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, base, len)) { > > + error = -EFAULT; > > + break; > > + } > > Hm, perhaps we should just properly check the len field instead? That's > what is being overflowed here... > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
-- Thanks, Oliver --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root ...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 2:04 am)
Re: kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local r...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sun Feb 10, 2:32 am)
Re: kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local r...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 2:38 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Bastian Blank
, (Sun Feb 10, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 9:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 8:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Bastian Blank
, (Sun Feb 10, 8:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Oliver Pinter
, (Sun Feb 10, 9:02 am)
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the...
, Greg KH
, (Sun Feb 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the...
, Oliver Pinter
, (Sun Feb 10, 1:48 pm)
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the...
, Oliver Pinter
, (Sun Feb 10, 1:44 pm)
Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sun Feb 10, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Niki Denev
, (Sun Feb 10, 8:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice...
, Oliver Pinter
, (Sun Feb 10, 8:04 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
[PATCH 16/19] provide tss_desc
Greg KH
[patch 00/60] 2.6.26-stable review
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Nick Piggin
[rfc][patch 2/3] slab: introduce SMP alignment
Hannes Eder
[PATCH 00/43] drivers/net: fix (sparse) warnings
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
800 guests
online.
Syndicate