Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 | KernelTrap

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>

Cc: Greg KH <greg@...>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Paul Jackson <pj@...>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...>, Mel Gorman <mel@...>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...>

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 - 6:31 am

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:42:21 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text> 
> 
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > Once the patch goes into Linus's tree, feel free to send it to the
> > stable@kernel.org address so that we can include it in the 2.6.24.x
> > tree.
> 
> I've been ignoring the patches because they say "PATCH 2.6.24-mm1", and so 
> I simply don't know whether it's supposed to go into *my* kernel or just 
> -mm.
> 
> There's also been several versions and discussions, so I'd really like to 
> have somebody send me a final patch with all the acks etc.. One that is 
> clearly for me, not for -mm.
> 

fyi, I won't be able to do much patch-wrangling until Tuesday or Wednesday.
All the big machines are disconnected and mothballed due to domestic
s/carpet/hardwood/g.

--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 2, 4:12 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Andi Kleen, (Sat Feb 2, 5:09 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 2, 5:37 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Mon Feb 4, 2:20 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Mel Gorman, (Tue Feb 5, 10:31 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 5, 11:23 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 5, 2:12 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 5, 2:27 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 5, 3:04 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 3:15 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 5, 4:06 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 6:17 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 5, 3:56 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 4:51 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 5, 5:03 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 5:33 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 5, 6:04 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 6:50 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 5, 6:44 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 5, 7:14 am)

[2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 5, 5:26 am)

[PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask t..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Fri Feb 8, 3:45 pm)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodema..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Feb 10, 1:29 am)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodema..., Greg KH, (Sun Feb 10, 1:49 am)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodema..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun Feb 10, 3:42 am)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodema..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Mon Feb 11, 12:47 pm)

[PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restr..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 12, 12:30 am)

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently r..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 1:06 am)

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently r..., Andrew Morton, (Tue Feb 12, 1:07 am)

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently r..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 12, 9:18 am)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodema..., Andrew Morton, (Sun Feb 10, 6:31 am)

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 9, 2:11 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 6, 1:38 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu Feb 7, 4:31 am)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 5, 5:57 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Feb 6, 2:49 am)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 5, 10:17 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 6, 12:11 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 5, 6:15 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 5, 6:12 pm)

Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doe..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 6, 12:00 pm)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Andi Kleen, (Sat Feb 2, 7:30 am)

Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all d..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 4, 3:03 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Andy Whitcroft	Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
James Bottomley	Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Alan	Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
git:

linux-netdev:
Natalie Protasevich	[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Winkler, Tomas	RE: iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall"
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 458 guests online.

Syndicate