Re: [patch 2/4] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@...>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...>, Avi Kivity <avi@...>, Izik Eidus <izike@...>, <kvm-devel@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <steiner@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <daniel.blueman@...>
Date: Friday, February 1, 2008 - 7:35 pm

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:19:32PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:

No, we need a callout when we are becoming more restrictive, but not
when becoming more permissive.  I would have to guess that is the case
for any of these callouts.  It is for both GRU and XPMEM.  I would
expect the same is true for KVM, but would like a ruling from Andrea on
that.

Thanks,
Robin
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 2/4] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate addres..., Robin Holt, (Fri Feb 1, 7:35 pm)