On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:24:05PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:I did some testing and the new code does not emit warnings which were not emitted before. But previously you had to use less typical configurations to see them like HOTPLUG_CPU=y, HOTPLUG=n, gcc 3.3 It is the misinformation being spread that irritates me. Thousand of hours, no real bugs found etc. Anyway - that is all forgot tomorrow when we get the warning level down to zero. The good thing about getting it upstream is the additional attention. If we do not get it down to acceptable levels I have no problems turning off the section mismatch in minline but keep it enabled in -mm. Sam --
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.26-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
git: | |
