On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> 
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> 
> > >  config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> > >  	def_bool y
> > >  
> > > +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > > +	def_bool y
> > > +
> > No.
> > Please do:
> >  config X86
> > +	select HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > 
> > Yes - this is a valid use of select.
> 
> i see - and there's lots of other examples of this and other similar 
> things in other architectures as well. Could we do that as a separate 
> cleanup patch instead, to keep the Kconfig file consistently structured.

I would prefer new stuff to use the recommended method.
But I have no strong feelign for it and at the moment I am fed up
in Section mismatch warnings :-(

	Sam
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/