[Sorry for using an invalid mail address in my previous post]

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> [08-02-01 10:28]:
quoted text
>Lars Noschinski <lklml@ml.noschinski.de> writes:
>
>> For an university project, we had to write a toy filesystem (ext2-like),
>> for which I would like to implement sparse file support. For this, I
>> digged through the ext2 source code; but I could not find the point,
>> where ext2 detects holes.
>>
>> As far as I can see from fs/buffer.c, an hole is a buffer_head which is
>> not mapped, but uptodate. But I cannot find a relevant source line,
>> where ext2 makes usage of this information.
>
>It does not explicitely detect holes; holey data is just never written
>so no space for it is allocated.

Thanks for the answers. No that I know that, it is kind of obvious. I
was irritated yesterday by a bug a bug in our implementation (number of
used blocks is reported as filesize/blocksize); so I was expecting the
VFS to issue write requests for empty pages (which would be sillly, I
know).

Thanks,
     Lars.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/