don't strip Ccs, thanks. (and try not to tofu either.)

On Jan 31 2008 17:01, Justin Banks wrote:
quoted text
>
>uname -a will tell you, though.

No. uname is generally not a reliable source to tell you the bitness (or 
more precisely, the arch). It may even happen that you cannot find out 
at all if access permissions are set 'correctly'.
You may find ELF64 files flying around in the filesystem, and while that 
is a strong indication of a 64-bit kernel being running, it is not a 
definite Yes.


02:31 ccgmbh:~ > uname -a
Linux ccgmbh 2.6.23.10-ccj62-regular #1 SMP 2007/10/26 14:17:15 UTC i686 
athlon i386 GNU/Linux

02:32 ccgmbh:~ > file `which uname`
/bin/uname: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for 
GNU/Linux 2.6.4, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/