From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:19:29 -0800
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/6][v3] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()
Determine if sender of a signal is from an ancestor namespace. This
function will be used in a follow-on patch.
This is an early/lightly tested RFC patch. Would it be safe to implement
siginfo_from_user() as below and then use it dereference the pid
namespace of sender ?
This is based on discussions on the patch from Oleg Nesterov and me
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/25/462.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 55f41b6..058b4c0 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -820,6 +820,47 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
{
return (sig < SIGRTMIN) && sigismember(&signals->signal, sig);
}
+/*
+ * Return 1 if this signal originated directly from a user process (i.e via
+ * kill(), tkill(), sigqueue()). Return 0 otherwise.
+ *
+ * TODO:
+ * Making SI_ASYNCIO a kernel signal could make this less hacky.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
+static inline int siginfo_from_user(siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info) &&
+ info->si_code != SI_ASYNCIO)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int siginfo_from_ancestor_ns(struct task_struct *t,
+ siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ /*
+ * Ensure signal is from user-space before checking pid namespace
+ */
+ if (siginfo_from_user(info)) {
+ /*
+ * If we do not have a pid in the receiver's namespace,
+ * we must be an ancestor of the receiver.
+ */
+ if (task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t)) <= 0)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+static inline int siginfo_from_ancestor_ns(struct task_struct *t, siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
int group)
--
1.5.2.5
--
