On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:41:27AM -0800, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com wrote:
quoted text
> Drivers use mmap followed by pgprot_* and remap_pfn_range or vm_insert_pfn,
> in order to export reserved memory to userspace. Currently, such mappings are
> not tracked and hence not kept consistent with other mappings (/dev/mem,
> pci resource, ioremap) for the sme memory, that may exist in the system.
> 
> The following patchset adds x86 PAT attribute tracking and untracking for
> pfnmap related APIs.
> 
> First three patches in the patchset are changing the generic mm code to fit
> in this tracking. Last four patches are x86 specific to make things work
> with x86 PAT code. The patchset aso introduces pgprot_writecombine interface,
> which gives writecombine mapping when enabled, falling back to
> pgprot_noncached otherwise.
> 
> This patch:
> 
> While working on x86 PAT, we faced some hurdles with trackking
> remap_pfn_range() regions, as we do not have any information to say
> whether that PFNMAP mapping is linear for the entire vma range or
> it is smaller granularity regions within the vma.
> 
> A simple solution to this is to use vm_pgoff as an indicator for
> linear mapping over the vma region. Currently, remap_pfn_range
> only sets vm_pgoff for COW mappings. Below patch changes the
> logic and sets the vm_pgoff irrespective of COW. This will still not
> be enough for the case where pfn is zero (vma region mapped to
> physical address zero). But, for all the other cases, we can look at
> pfnmap VMAs and say whether the mappng is for the entire vma region
> or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |    9 +++++++++
>  mm/memory.c        |    7 +++----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c	2008-12-17 17:24:31.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c	2008-12-18 10:10:46.000000000 -0800
> @@ -1575,11 +1575,10 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struc
>  	 * behaviour that some programs depend on. We mark the "original"
>  	 * un-COW'ed pages by matching them up with "vma->vm_pgoff".
>  	 */
> -	if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) {
> -		if (addr != vma->vm_start || end != vma->vm_end)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +	if (addr == vma->vm_start && end == vma->vm_end)
>  		vma->vm_pgoff = pfn;
> -	}
> +	else if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP;
>  
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h	2008-12-17 17:24:31.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h	2008-12-18 10:10:46.000000000 -0800
> @@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>  #define FAULT_FLAG_WRITE	0x01	/* Fault was a write access */
>  #define FAULT_FLAG_NONLINEAR	0x02	/* Fault was via a nonlinear mapping */
>  
> +static inline int is_linear_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	return ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) && vma->vm_pgoff);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	return (vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP);
> +}
>  
>  /*
>   * vm_fault is filled by the the pagefault handler and passed to the vma's

This is fine by me, however:
1. Can you add some comments to say "this is not for core vm but for pat,
   oh and a pgoff of zero is not going to work".
2. Can you please justify to me (or the changelog) roughly why PAT wants
   to know if the mapping is linear or not? Presumably it has to handle
   both types? If performance wasn't an issue, then you could manually scan
   the ptes to verify (which would solve your zero-offset bug). etc.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/