login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
December
»
18
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008 - 5:52 am
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:17:54AM +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > > Introduce the PROC macro in the generic header file > > include/linux/linkage.h to annotate functions in assembly > > files. This is a first step to fully annotate functions > > (procedures) in .S-files. The PROC macro complements the > > already existing and being used ENDPROC macro. The generic > > implementation of PROC is exactly the same as ENTRY. > > > > The goal is to annotate functions, at least those called > > from C code, with PROC at the beginning and ENDPROC at the > > end. This is for the benefit of debugging and tracing. It > > will also allow to introduce a framework to check for > > nesting problems and missing annotations in a later stage > > by overriding ENTRY/END and PROC/ENDPROC in architecture- > > specific code, after the annotation errors have been fixed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > I understand where you are coming from with these. > But what I see now is: > > ENTRY/END > PROC/ENDPROC > KPROBE_ENTRY/KPROBE_END
btw., KPROBE_ENTRY is an ugly euphemism. It should be renamed to NOKPROBE_ENTRY/NOKPROBE_END. Ingo --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Wed Dec 17, 2:17 am)
[PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in assembl ...
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Wed Dec 17, 2:17 am)
Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, David Howells
, (Wed Dec 17, 3:53 am)
Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Wed Dec 17, 4:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Wed Dec 17, 10:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Wed Dec 17, 10:38 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Wed Dec 17, 11:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Wed Dec 17, 11:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Thu Dec 18, 2:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Thu Dec 18, 2:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Russell King
, (Thu Dec 18, 3:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in as ...
, Jan Beulich
, (Thu Dec 18, 3:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Thu Dec 18, 4:30 am)
Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, Russell King
, (Thu Dec 18, 4:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Thu Dec 18, 5:03 am)
Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Thu Dec 18, 5:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Alexander van Heukelum
, (Thu Dec 18, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Dec 18, 5:52 am)
Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
, Russell King
, (Thu Dec 18, 8:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in ass ...
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Thu Dec 18, 9:05 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Nick Piggin
Re: [PATCH 2/2] smp_call_function: use rwlocks on queues rather than rcu
Kyle Moffett
Re: [PATCH 1/4] stringbuf: A string buffer implementation
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 00/12] mm/x86: bootmem
Andrew Morton
Re: [patch 1/5] wait: use lock bitops for __wait_on_bit_lock
git
:
Stephen Boyd
Re: [PATCH] Speed up bash completion loading
Jakub Narebski
Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
Catalin Marinas
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2
Eric Wong
[PATCH 5/5] rerere: add the diff command
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] fsl_soc: add support to gianfar for fixed-link property
Linux Kernel Mailing List
fat: fix parse_options()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ipmi: add oem message handling
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/85xx/86xx: Fix build w/ CONFIG_PCI=n
Linux Kernel Mailing List
KVM: x86 emulator: during rep emulation decrement ECX only if emulation succeeded
linux-netdev
:
Paweł Staszewski
Re: DCA/IOAT problem
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
Ingo Oeser
Re: [NET-NEXT PATCH 3/3] e1000e: add support for new 82574L part
Rick Jones
Re: UDP path MTU discovery
Dmitry Kozlov
Re: [PATCH v8] PPTP: PPP over IPv4 (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol)
openbsd-misc
:
David Vasek
Re: how to undelete?
Gruppo BCC
Banca inviato una notifica che e necessario completare
Pau Amaro-Seoane
Re: First install: Grub doesn't find partitions
Nick Holland
Re: Unattended OpenBSD Installation
stuart van Zee
Re: CVS hosed
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate