Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Brownell
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008 - 4:02 am

On Thursday 18 December 2008, Samuel Ortiz wrote:

I'd rather remove that "if (can't happen) { pr_err, return }"
code myself ... otherwise, sure.

- Dave
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for December 15, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Dec 15, 8:06 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 12:26 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (MTD), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 4:27 pm)
[PATCH -next] mtd: fix dataflash printk formats, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 4:33 pm)
[PATCH -next] mtd: fix m25p80 printk formats, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 4:36 pm)
[PATCH -next] mtd: fix nandsim sched.h references, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 4:37 pm)
[PATCH -next] mtd: fix nettel printk formats, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 15, 4:38 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd), Randy Dunlap, (Wed Dec 17, 12:43 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd), Samuel Ortiz, (Thu Dec 18, 2:45 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd), Samuel Ortiz, (Thu Dec 18, 3:57 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd), David Brownell, (Thu Dec 18, 4:02 am)