On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:15:15PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
...
quoted text
> > A "GSI" (Generic Sys Interrupt?) is associated with each entry in
> > the MSI-X table. Driver then calls request_irq() to bind an interrupt
> > handler to each GSI. So the driver never directly sees the "message".
> 
> Oh, you mean the array of irq_handlers in the MSI-X table should 
> correspond to a particular message ?

No. I mean each MSI-X entry has an address+message pair and each MSI-X entry
is associated with the parameters passed to each call of request_irq().
Pass in unique private data to each call of request_irq() and the driver
can determine which message was delivered when the ISR gets called.
(ISR == Interrupt Service Routine, aka driver IRQ handler)

quoted text
> I remember sometime back somebody stated that one might not get 
> the requested number of handlers what you requested. 

Correct. The limit is defined by the number of GSI's available
from the HW.

quoted text
> In such a case, if the irq_handlers are mapped in a static fashion, one 
> might not get any interrupt callbacks for a specific functionality of 
> the hardware. Or is there something missing in what i understood ?

Correct.

grant
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/