Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 - 11:20 am

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

As with any other caching structure, you can discover its size,
associativity, and replacement policy by artificially trying to provoke
patterns that produce pathological timings.

At Transmeta, at one time we used a 32-entry direct-mapped cache, which
ended up with a ~96% hit rate on common Win95 benchmarks.

I should, however, make it clear that there are other alternatives for
speeding up segment descriptor loading, and not all of them rely on a cache.

	-hpa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 5:28 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 6:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 8:47 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 9:58 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Tue Nov 4, 10:13 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 10:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 10:39 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 11:06 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Nov 4, 11:44 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Nov 4, 1:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Nov 4, 1:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Nov 4, 1:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Nov 4, 5:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Nov 5, 10:53 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Nov 5, 11:14 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Nov 5, 11:15 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Nov 5, 11:20 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Nov 5, 11:26 am)