On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:

Nice find.

quoted text
> Then, because the hw rate value of such frames is zero

BTW I believe frames should not go out at hw rate value 0, I did some
test a while back on this rate and its not exactly reliable, you will
get very funky behavior on it. Are you seeing that rate being used on
legacy-hal? Last I asked about it too its not something people know
about as being desired effect. I could be wrong but it'd be
interesting to see where this is used correctly.

quoted text
>, and, since
> 63266a653589e1a237527479f10212ea77ce7844 "ath5k: rates cleanup", we do not fall back to the basic rate, such packets would trigger
> the following WARN_ON:

So its slow because using rate 0 takes a while? If indeed you don't
see a valid use for this rate I'd say to completely disallow it and
use BUG_ON() on it.

  Luis
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/