Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 03:25:15PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>  =20
>> It sounds like the problem with my code is that "null sched domain"
>> translates into "default root-domain" which is understandably unexpect=
ed
quoted text
>> by Dimitri (and myself).  Really I intended root-domains to become
>> associated with each exclusive/disjoint cpuset that is created.  In a
>> way, non-balanced/isolated cpus could be modeled as an exclusive cpuse=
t
quoted text
>> with one member, but that is somewhat beyond the scope of the
>>    =20
>
> Actually, at one time, that is how things were setup.  Setting the
> cpu_exclusive bit on a single cpu cpuset would isolate that cpu from
> load balancing.
>  =20
Do you know if this was pre or post the root-domain code?  Here is a
reference to the commit:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dco=
mmit;h=3D57d885fea0da0e9541d7730a9e1dcf734981a173

A bisection that shows when this last worked for you would be very
appreciated if you have the time, Dimitri.

Regards,
-Greg