* Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Consider netconsole case as special in local_bh_enable()/_disable().
> This patch skips in_irq() and irqs_disabled() warnings for NETPOLL
> configs when it's safe wrt. do_softirq().
> 
> Reported-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> ---
> [apply on top of my first softirq patch in this thread]
> 
> diff -Nurp a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c	2008-11-19 07:33:23.000000000 +0000
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c	2008-11-19 07:26:28.000000000 +0000
> @@ -76,7 +76,12 @@ static void __local_bh_disable(unsigned 
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
> +	if (!softirq_count())
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
> +#else
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
> +#endif
>  
>  	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>  	add_preempt_count(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> @@ -138,7 +143,16 @@ static inline void _local_bh_enable_ip(u
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
> +	/*
> +	 * Special-case - netconsole runs network code with all interrupts
> +	 * disabled. Warn only if it can be really dangerous:
> +	 */
> +	if (softirq_count() == SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || irqs_disabled());
> +#else
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || irqs_disabled());
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  #endif

this is a very ugly patch, not really acceptable.

printk methods should not be doing softirq processing - period.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/