Re: busted CFS group load balancer?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ken Chen
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 - 10:27 am

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

Hmm?  it is only true mostly on flat smp machine, or on numa system
where task is woken up across a sched-domain.

There is this code in try_to_wake_up():

                for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
                        if (cpu_isset(cpu, sd->span)) {
                                update_shares(sd);
                                break;
                        }
                }

It doesn't iterate to the top half of the time on numa machine.

- Ken
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
busted CFS group load balancer?, Ken Chen, (Fri Nov 14, 6:14 pm)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Chris Friesen, (Mon Nov 17, 8:37 am)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Ken Chen, (Mon Nov 17, 1:04 pm)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Chris Friesen, (Mon Nov 17, 2:19 pm)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Nov 17, 10:19 pm)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Ken Chen, (Tue Nov 18, 12:33 am)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Ken Chen, (Tue Nov 18, 12:52 am)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Nov 18, 5:30 am)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Nov 18, 6:48 am)
Re: busted CFS group load balancer?, Ken Chen, (Tue Nov 18, 10:27 am)