Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text >> ...
>>
>>>> +static unsigned int kstat_irqs_legacy[NR_IRQS_LEGACY][NR_CPUS];
>>> Do these need to be 32-bit? Maybe they'll fit in 16-bit, dunno.
>>>
>> struct irq_desc {
>> unsigned int irq;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>> struct list_head list;
>> struct list_head hash_entry;
>> struct timer_rand_state *timer_rand_state;
>> unsigned int *kstat_irqs;
>
> That doesn't address my question.
>
> The above array can be very large. Can we halve its size by using
> 16-bit quantities? Will this code ever encounter IRQ numbers larger
> than 65536?
>
NR_CPUS=4096, NR_IRQS_LEGACY=16, and that array will be 256k bytes
later could change that alloc_bootmem, so NR_CPUS will be replaced to nr_cpu_ids
YH
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13 , Yinghai Lu , (Thu Nov 13, 3:41 pm)