Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, <axboe@...>, dm-devel <dm-devel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 - 2:22 pm

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:40:18AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:

We use device congested to not block pdflush on a device that can't
currently accept I/O.  For a suspended device congested is always
correct, pdflush will just come back a little later and in the mean time
write out stuff that doesn't delay it.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Nov 10, 9:54 am)
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Alasdair G Kergon, (Mon Nov 10, 10:27 am)
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Nov 11, 2:21 pm)
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Nov 11, 2:22 pm)
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Nov 11, 2:18 pm)
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix d..., Alasdair G Kergon, (Mon Nov 10, 10:35 am)