login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
October
»
9
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Shaohua Li
Subject:
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008 - 12:06 am
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:40:34PM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:22:50PM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:04 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> >> > Round up address to a page, otherwise the last page isn't mapped. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 3 ++- > >> >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> >> > > >> >> > Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c > >> >> > =================================================================== > >> >> > --- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c 2008-10-09 11:42:33.000000000 +0800 > >> >> > +++ linux/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c 2008-10-09 11:43:22.000000000 +0800 > >> >> > @@ -721,7 +721,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, > >> >> > unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT; > >> >> > int ret; > >> >> > > >> >> > - last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size-1); > >> >> > + last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, > >> >> > + round_up(start + size-1, PAGE_SIZE)); > >> >> > if (last_mapped_pfn > max_pfn_mapped) > >> >> > max_pfn_mapped = last_mapped_pfn; > >> >> > >> >> should use > >> >> > >> >> last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size); > >> > No, this still can't guarantee page aligned, though this works in my > >> > test > >> > >> who will call arch_add_memory? that should be start and size already > >> be page aligned. > > It's memory hotplug. Doing a round up is always ok and safe even it might be already aligned. > > > > it seems rounding up in that case is wrong... > > if the caller call that funtion with extra half page, you don't need > map that half page, because you can not use it.
shouldn't we mark such page as reserved and so it will not be used? This is the way we handle hole. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Shaohua Li
, (Wed Oct 8, 10:31 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Yinghai Lu
, (Wed Oct 8, 11:04 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Shaohua Li
, (Wed Oct 8, 11:08 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Yinghai Lu
, (Wed Oct 8, 11:22 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Shaohua Li
, (Wed Oct 8, 11:28 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Yinghai Lu
, (Wed Oct 8, 11:40 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Shaohua Li
, (Thu Oct 9, 12:06 am)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Yasunori Goto
, (Mon Oct 13, 10:16 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Shaohua Li
, (Tue Oct 14, 12:30 am)
Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address
, Yinghai Lu
, (Tue Oct 14, 10:09 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike
[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood
[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov
Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried
Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev
:
Arnaud Ebalard
Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey
Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder
[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc
:
Joachim Schipper
Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith
Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan
Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate