On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:21:32 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:01:19 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Delaying add_to_lru() and do it in batched manner like page_vec.
> > For doing that 2 flags PCG_USED and PCG_LRU.
> > 
> > Because __set_page_cgroup_lru() itself doesn't take lock_page_cgroup(),
> > we need a sanity check inside lru_lock().
> > 
> > And this delaying make css_put()/get() complicated. 
> > To make it clear,
> >  * css_get() is called from mem_cgroup_add_list().
> >  * css_put() is called from mem_cgroup_remove_list().
> >  * css_get()->css_put() is called while try_charge()->commit/cancel sequence.
> > is newly added.
> > 
> 
> I like this new policy, but
> 
> > @@ -710,17 +774,18 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(s
> 
> ===
>                 if (PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
>                         ClearPageCgroupLRU(pc);
>                         __mem_cgroup_remove_list(mz, pc);
>                         css_put(&pc->mem_cgroup->css);
>                 }
>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
>         }
> ===
> 
> Is this css_put needed yet?
> 
Oh, nice catch. it's unnecessary.
I'll fix this in the next. Thank you for review.


I'll post still-under-discuss set (v7), tomorrow.
includes
  - charge/commit/cancel
  - move account & force_empty
  - lazy lru free
  - lazy lru add
Currently works well under my test..

In the next week, I'd like to restart Mem+Swap series.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/