Kalpak Shah wrote:

quoted text
> ext4_xattr_set_handle() eventually ends up calling
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty() which tries to expand the inode by shifting the
> EAs. This leads to the xattr_sem being downed again and leading to a
> deadlock.
> 
> This patch makes sure that if ext4_xattr_set_handle() is in the
> call-chain, ext4_mark_inode_dirty() will not expand the inode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>

Yes, this fixes my testcase.  Thanks, Kalpak.

-Eric

quoted text
> Index: linux-2.6.27-rc7/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc7.orig/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc7/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> @@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle, 
>  	struct ext4_xattr_block_find bs = {
>  		.s = { .not_found = -ENODATA, },
>  	};
> +	unsigned long no_expand;
>  	int error;
>  
>  	if (!name)
> @@ -966,6 +967,9 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle, 
>  	if (strlen(name) > 255)
>  		return -ERANGE;
>  	down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
> +	no_expand = EXT4_I(inode)->i_state & EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND;
> +	EXT4_I(inode)->i_state |= EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND;
> +
>  	error = ext4_get_inode_loc(inode, &is.iloc);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto cleanup;
> @@ -1042,6 +1046,8 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle, 
>  cleanup:
>  	brelse(is.iloc.bh);
>  	brelse(bs.bh);
> +	if (no_expand == 0)
> +		EXT4_I(inode)->i_state &= ~EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND;
>  	up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
>  	return error;
>  }
> 
> Thanks,
> Kalpak
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/