Re: [PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Monday, October 6, 2008 - 8:11 am

> > Okay, I was confused too.  Looking more closely, it's apparent that 

I guess Hannes patch shoud simply be dropped....

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: hda_intel (sigmatel) defunct in mmotm 2008-09-13-03-09, Matthew Ranostay, (Mon Sep 15, 7:16 am)
Re: hda_intel (sigmatel) defunct in mmotm 2008-09-13-03-09, Matthew Ranostay, (Tue Sep 16, 7:43 am)
Re: hda_intel (sigmatel) defunct in mmotm 2008-09-13-03-09, Matthew Ranostay, (Wed Sep 17, 7:09 am)
suspend (uhci_hcd) defunct in mmotm 2008-09-13-03-09, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Sep 17, 9:46 am)
[PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types, Alan Stern, (Thu Sep 25, 2:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Sep 25, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types, Alan Stern, (Fri Sep 26, 6:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types, Pavel Machek, (Mon Oct 6, 8:11 am)