Corey Minyard a écrit :
quoted text
> Change the UDP hash lock from an rwlock to RCU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> ---
>  include/net/udp.h |    9 +++++----
>  net/ipv4/udp.c    |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  net/ipv6/udp.c    |   17 +++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index addcdc6..35aa104 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct udp_skb_cb {
>  #define UDP_SKB_CB(__skb)	((struct udp_skb_cb *)((__skb)->cb))
>  
>  extern struct hlist_head udp_hash[UDP_HTABLE_SIZE];
> -extern rwlock_t udp_hash_lock;
> +extern spinlock_t udp_hash_wlock;
>  
>  
>  /* Note: this must match 'valbool' in sock_setsockopt */
> @@ -112,12 +112,13 @@ static inline void udp_lib_hash(struct sock *sk)
>  
>  static inline void udp_lib_unhash(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> -	write_lock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
> -	if (sk_del_node_init(sk)) {
> +	spin_lock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
> +	if (sk_del_node_init_rcu(sk)) {
>  		inet_sk(sk)->num = 0;
>  		sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
>  	}
> -	write_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
> +	synchronize_rcu();

UDP central rwlock can hurt performance, because of cache line ping pong,
so your patch really makes sense.

Me wondering what impact this synchronize_rcu() can have on mono-threaded
VOIP applications using lot of UDP sockets. What is the maximum delay of
this function ?

For "struct file" freeing, we chose call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu()

Maybe we could add a generic rcu head to struct sock, and use call_rcu() in
sk_prot_free() for sockets needing RCU (udp after your patch is applied, maybe
tcp on future patches, while I believe previous work on the subject concluded
RCU was not giving good results for short lived http sessions) ?

Or just add SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to slab creation in proto_register()
for "struct proto udp_prot/udpv6_prot" so that kmem_cache_free() 
done in sk_prot_free() can defer freeing to RCU...




--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/