Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
quoted text
>> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
>> > Subject             : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -&gt; 2.6.28
>> > Submitter   : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>> > Date                : 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
>> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
>> >               http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
>> 
>> Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23.
> 
> Still, tbench results from 2.6.26 are better than from 2.6.27-rc.
> That's why it's still on the list, but if you think that's not relevant, please
> let me know and I'll drop it.

Note that 2.6.27 beats 2.6.26 by 30% with bulk traffic over
loopback as opposed to the small packets sent by tbench where
I saw a 5% drop in performance on my machine.

So I'm not sure whether this should really be classified as
a regression if we limit ourselves to the changes between 26
and 27.

The changes prior to 26 seem to be more significant.

Chyeers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/