[PATCH] dumptrace: x86: consistently include loglevel, print stack switch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Saturday, October 4, 2008 - 2:12 pm

- i386 and x86_64: always printk the 'data' parameter
 - i386: announce stack switch (irq -> normal)
 - i386: check if there is a stack switch before announcing it

There is a warning that 'context' might come out corrupt in early
boot. If this is true it should be fixed, not worked around.

Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c |   17 ++++++-----------
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c |    9 +++++++--
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index 09cd37c..851b692 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -104,16 +104,12 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		context = (struct thread_info *)
 			((unsigned long)stack & (~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)));
 		bp = print_context_stack(context, stack, bp, ops, data, NULL);
-		/*
-		 * Should be after the line below, but somewhere
-		 * in early boot context comes out corrupted and we
-		 * can't reference it:
-		 */
-		if (ops->stack(data, "IRQ") < 0)
-			break;
+
 		stack = (unsigned long *)context->previous_esp;
 		if (!stack)
 			break;
+		if (ops->stack(data, "IRQ") < 0)
+			break;
 		touch_nmi_watchdog();
 	}
 }
@@ -134,6 +130,7 @@ static void print_trace_warning(void *data, char *msg)
 
 static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
 {
+	printk("%s <%s> ", (char *)data, name);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -142,11 +139,9 @@ static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
  */
 static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
 {
-	printk("%s [<%08lx>] ", (char *)data, addr);
-	if (!reliable)
-		printk("? ");
-	print_symbol("%s\n", addr);
 	touch_nmi_watchdog();
+	printk(data);
+	printk_address(addr, reliable);
 }
 
 static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 9e40357..029c141 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -247,24 +247,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
 static void
 print_trace_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg, unsigned long symbol)
 {
+	printk(data);
 	print_symbol(msg, symbol);
 	printk("\n");
 }
 
 static void print_trace_warning(void *data, char *msg)
 {
-	printk("%s\n", msg);
+	printk("%s%s\n", (char *)data, msg);
 }
 
 static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
 {
-	printk(" <%s> ", name);
+	printk("%s <%s> ", (char *)data, name);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Print one address/symbol entries per line.
+ */
 static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
 {
 	touch_nmi_watchdog();
+	printk(data);
 	printk_address(addr, reliable);
 }
 
-- 
1.5.4.3

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumpstack: x86: move die_nmi to dumpstack_32.c, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumpstack: x86: make printk_address equal, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumptrace: x86: consistently include loglevel, pri ..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumpstack: x86: use log_lvl and unify trace formatting, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumpstack: i386: make kstack= an early boot-param ..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
[PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sat Oct 4, 2:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sun Oct 5, 3:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sun Oct 5, 4:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps, Alexander van Heukelum, (Mon Oct 6, 2:43 am)