login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
October
»
4
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Steven Rostedt
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption
Date: Saturday, October 4, 2008 - 10:18 am
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
quoted text
> > Or use this code, based on a temporary breakpoint, to do the code > patching (part of the -lttng tree). It does not require stop_machine at > all and is nmi safe. >
When this is supported for all archs, and can be done at all functions then I could use it. I may just have the arch specific code use it, but we'll see. Also, how good is it at patching 20,000 call sites? -- Steve --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable pre ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Fri Oct 3, 11:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sat Oct 4, 1:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Sat Oct 4, 7:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sat Oct 4, 7:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Sat Oct 4, 9:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Sat Oct 4, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sat Oct 4, 10:41 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Sat Oct 4, 3:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Sat Oct 4, 4:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Oct 5, 3:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Mon Oct 6, 6:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Mon Oct 6, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Mon Oct 6, 10:13 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Thomas Gleixner
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2)
Jeff Garzik
Re: Linux 2.6.29
Eric W. Biederman
[PATCH 1/2] msi: Safer state caching.
Andreas Schwab
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1
Mark Lord
Re: [PATCH 1/7] block: Add block_flush_device()
git
:
Erik Faye-Lund
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?
Francis Moreau
Re: Track /etc directory using Git
Junio C Hamano
Re: "error: non-monotonic index" during fresh linux-2.6.git cloning.
Octavio Alvarez
Re: What does git reset do?
Junio C Hamano
Re: "error: non-monotonic index" during fresh linux-2.6.git cloning.
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.
Rick Jones
[PATCH] iproute2: enable setting rto_min, rtt and rttvar in tc-esque units
Christian Bell
Re: [PATCH 1/2] udp: introduce struct udp_table and multiple rwlocks
Herbert Xu
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drm/radeon/kms: add rn50/r100/r200 CS tracker.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
p54usb: Add device ID for Dell WLA3310 USB
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB: saa7134: clear warning noise
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: bcm5974 - add driver for Macbook Air and Pro Penryn touchpads
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mfd: driver for the TC6387XB TMIO controller.
openbsd-misc
:
Calomel Org
Re: PF cluestick please - low priority queue spills over into normal queue
Jim Willis
Re: procfs in OpenBSD
Rick Pettit
Re: : Real men don't attack straw men
Timo Schoeler
Re: OT: 32bit vs 64bit network card question
Tony Abernethy
Re: Completeness & consistency, was: A sad thread
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate