Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Saturday, October 4, 2008 - 10:18 am

On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

When this is supported for all archs, and can be done at all functions 
then I could use it.

I may just have the arch specific code use it, but we'll see.

Also, how good is it at patching 20,000 call sites?

-- Steve

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ..., Steven Rostedt, (Sat Oct 4, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Oct 6, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Oct 6, 10:13 am)