Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008 - 10:06 am

On Monday 2008-09-29 15:44, Chris Mason wrote:

Definitely. While, due to the changing disk format, long-term storage
is not really an option yet, the filesystem can be really useful in
network-booted hybrid clients that have a local disk in an unionfs
compound mount as a COW rw storage device (because RAM *is* limited
after all). Keep up the work.


Jan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Chris Mason, (Mon Sep 29, 12:44 pm)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 3, 12:18 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Oct 3, 10:06 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 5, 5:24 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Serge E. Hallyn, (Sun Oct 5, 7:11 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 5, 8:09 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Chris Mason, (Mon Oct 6, 6:40 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 7, 8:27 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Chris Mason, (Tue Oct 7, 9:01 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 7, 1:25 pm)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, David Sanders, (Tue Oct 7, 2:20 pm)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Randy.Dunlap, (Tue Oct 7, 2:27 pm)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Oct 8, 5:53 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, David Sanders, (Wed Oct 8, 10:48 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Daniel Phillips, (Wed Oct 8, 2:33 pm)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Oct 9, 1:22 am)
Re: [RFC] Btrfs mainline plans, Theodore Tso, (Thu Oct 9, 8:01 pm)