On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> *What* is, forever? Data integrity syncs should have pages operated on

quoted text
>> in-order, until we get to the end of the range. Circular writeback could

>> go through again, possibly, but no more than once.

>

> OK, I have been able to reproduce it somewhat. It is not a livelock,

> but what is happening is that direct IO read basically does an fsync

> on the file before performing the IO. The fsync gets stuck behind the

> dd that is dirtying the pages, and ends up following behind it and

> doing all its IO for it.

>

> The following patch avoids the issue for direct IO, by using the range

> syncs rather than trying to sync the whole file.

>

> The underlying problem I guess is unchanged. Is it really a problem,

> though? The way I'd love to solve it is actually by adding another bit

> or two to the pagecache radix tree,  that can be used to transiently tag

> the tree for future operations. That way we could record the dirty and

> writeback pages up front, and then only bother with operating on them.

>

> That's *if* it really is a problem. I don't have much pity for someone

> doing buffered IO and direct IO to the same pages of the same file :)

I've seen lots of discussions here about different options in syncing. in

this case a fix is to do a fsync of a range. I've also seen discussions of

how the kernel filesystem code can do ordered writes without having to

wait for them with the use of barriers, is this capability exported to

userspace? if so, could you point me at documentation for it?
David Lang

--

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/