Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
>
> umm, yeah, the whole bitmap interface is busted from that POV.


Yup cannot find equivalent bitmap operations for cpu_alloc.

Also the search operations already use find_next_zero_bit() and
find_next_bit(). So this should be okay.

We could define new bitops:

bitmap_set_range(dst, start, end)
bitmap_clear_range(dst, start, end)

int find_zero_bits(dst, start, end, nr_of_zero_bits)

but then there are additional alignment requirements that such a generic
function would not be able to check for.


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/