Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008 - 2:04 am

* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:


it's getting off topic, but i really dont get it why you cannot go via 
the standard LEDS framework, and why you have to hook into the x86 idle 
notifiers. (which we are hoping to get rid of)

RAS does not need that precise accounting. It just needs a heartbeat 
timer that tells it how to do the pretty lights and to report whether 
the CPU is still alive. Something that seems to be fully within the 
scope of LEDS. What am i missing?

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Mike Travis, (Mon Sep 29, 11:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Rusty Russell, (Tue Sep 30, 3:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 1, 2:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Rusty Russell, (Wed Oct 1, 5:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Oct 2, 2:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Mike Travis, (Thu Oct 2, 5:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Oct 3, 2:04 am)