login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
October
»
3
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 11:48 pm
> Hi, Andy.
quoted text
> > I tested your patch in my desktop. > The test is just kernel compile with single thread. > My system environment is as follows. > > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz > MemTotal: 2065856 kB > > When I tested vanilla, compile time is as follows. > > 2433.53user 187.96system 42:05.99elapsed 103%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 0maxresident)k > 588752inputs+4503408outputs (127major+55456246minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > When I tested your patch, as follows. > > 2489.63user 202.41system 44:47.71elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 0maxresident)k > 538608inputs+4503928outputs (130major+55531561minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > Regresstion almost is above 2 minutes. > Do you think It is a trivial?
Ooops. this is definitly significant regression.
quoted text
> I know your patch is good to allocate hugepage. > But, I think many users don't need it, including embedded system and > desktop users yet. > > So I suggest you made it enable optionally.
No. if the patch has this significant regression, nobody turn on its option. We should fix that. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Wed Oct 1, 5:30 am)
[PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Wed Oct 1, 5:30 am)
[PATCH 2/4] pull out zone cpuset and watermark checks for ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Wed Oct 1, 5:30 am)
[PATCH 3/4] buddy: explicitly identify buddy field use in ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Wed Oct 1, 5:31 am)
[PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim for ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Wed Oct 1, 5:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 1, 8:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, MinChan Kim
, (Wed Oct 1, 7:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Wed Oct 1, 11:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity c ...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Thu Oct 2, 12:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/4] pull out zone cpuset and watermark checks ...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Thu Oct 2, 12:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/4] buddy: explicitly identify buddy field use ...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Thu Oct 2, 12:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Thu Oct 2, 12:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Thu Oct 2, 7:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Thu Oct 2, 8:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, Andy Whitcroft
, (Thu Oct 2, 8:04 am)
Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct recl ...
, kamezawa.hiroyu
, (Thu Oct 2, 8:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 2, 9:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Thu Oct 2, 8:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Thu Oct 2, 8:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Thu Oct 2, 11:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 3, 5:37 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4
, MinChan Kim
, (Mon Oct 6, 9:29 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Dave Jones
Re: OT: character encodings (was: Linux 2.6.20-rc4)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 17/36] sysdev: detect multiple driver registrations
Sam Ravnborg
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix make V=1
Nick Piggin
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 34/36] IB: rename "dev" to "srp_dev" in srp_host structure
git
:
Stephen R. van den Berg
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Teach git-describe to display distances from tags.
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: support fetch with autocrlf on
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 6/6] Teach core object handling functions about gitlinks
James Henstridge
Re: VCS comparison table
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event...
Lennert Buytenhek
Re: Distributed Switch Architecture(DSA)
Daniel Schaffrath
Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Guo-Fu Tseng
Re: jme: UDP checksum error, and lots of them
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 37/37] dccp: Debugging functions for feature negotiation
openbsd-misc
:
Claudio Jeker
Re: Vlan Tag on Vlan Tag (l2tunneling)
Josh Grosse
ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped working in -current
Pieter Verberne
File collision while using pkg_add
Tomas Bodzar
bsd: uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries
Community First Financial
Teacher A+ Loan
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise
Linux Kernel Mailing List
tracing: protect reader of cmdline output
Linux Kernel Mailing List
kconfig: recalc symbol value before showing search results
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] 5185/1: Fix spi num_chipselect for lubbock
Linux Kernel Mailing List
swsusp: provide users with a hint about the no_console_suspend option
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate