Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » October » 28

[Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump support go?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Jonathan Cameron
Subject: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump support go?
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 - 4:18 am

Dear All,

The new da903x driver is proving to be a good replacement for the out of kernel
driver I've been using previously.

Unfortunately there is still quite a lot of functionality to to add.

The key one for me is control of the USB charge pump. So the question is, does
this fit within the regulator framework (i.e. should I add it to the regulator
driver) or should this be a seperate driver (and if so where?)

Personally I'm not convinced it fits cleanly within the regulator framework
given it is probably only ever going to get called from one driver and has
somewhat odd properties!

Thanks,

Jonathan Cameron


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump suppo ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Tue Oct 28, 4:18 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Felipe Balbi, (Tue Oct 28, 4:23 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Mark Brown, (Tue Oct 28, 4:59 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Liam Girdwood, (Tue Oct 28, 5:03 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Wed Oct 29, 5:18 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Mark Brown, (Wed Oct 29, 5:27 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Wed Oct 29, 5:48 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Mark Brown, (Wed Oct 29, 6:05 am)
Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump s ..., Mike Rapoport, (Wed Oct 29, 6:21 am)