Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Monday, October 27, 2008 - 9:20 am

* Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:


ok.


i've propagated these impact-line fixes into tip/cpus4096-v2, thanks 
Rusty!

And once we have something that works reasonably well we can do a 
final respin of this branch with all fixlets back-propagated, for good 
bisectability.

the current variant, which force-disabled MAXSMP (i.e. only uses the 
non-dynamic cpumask_t branch), is looking good in my testing so far. 
(it has passed more than 100 boot tests today, on a handful of x86 
boxes)

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/1]: cpumask: fix compiler errors/warnings, Mike Travis, (Thu Oct 23, 1:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct c ..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Oct 27, 9:20 am)