Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Monday, October 27, 2008 - 4:57 am

On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Alright, then add a xen_biovec_phys_mergeable(vec1, vec2) in the xen
code that actually checks this for real. You can add your switch there
as well. Then put the BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE() in the xen arch includes,
done.

What Tomo is saying is that this has nothing to do with virtual merging,
and he's right.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Oct 23, 10:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:58 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:59 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_P ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Oct 26, 9:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 1:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 2:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 4:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jens Axboe, (Mon Oct 27, 4:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 2:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 5:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 6:06 am)