Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Monday, October 27, 2008 - 4:43 am

Jens Axboe wrote:

It needs to be a runtime switch, since we only want to do this when 
actually running under Xen.  Also, its possible that the two pages might 
actually be physically contiguous, so they could be merged anyway.

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Oct 23, 10:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:58 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:59 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_P ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 24, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Oct 26, 9:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 1:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 2:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 27, 4:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 2:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 5:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOV ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Oct 29, 6:06 am)