On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:18:43AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
quoted text
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >Yes, that's why pci_find_device() is deprecated.  But it doesn't also
> >need to be buggy ;-)
> 
> How about pci_get_bus_and_slot()? People would meet the problem with it 
> anyway.

What problem with it?  It's documented to return the device with an
increased refcount, and the implementation appears to do exactly that:

struct pci_dev * pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
{
        struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;

        while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
                if (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) == 0 &&
                   (dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn))
                        return dev;
        }
        return NULL;
}

Are you saying some users of it neglect to decrement the refcount before
disposing of the device?

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/