Paul P wrote:
quoted text
>> Which version of epoll do you have? The epoll_wait()
>> function does not 
>> accept an event mask (like you write above,
>> EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT). 
> 
> lol, I was a bit tired when I wrote that.  Ok, ignore the stuff related 
> to epoll_wait in my previous post.
>  
>> As optimization, if the EPOLLOUT bit is already set, you
>> don't need to 
>> keep calling epoll_ctl(fd,MOD,EPOLLOUT).
> 
> This is good to know.
> 
> So, I've got a few questions about what happens to data that accumulates 
> while I am sending and the fd is set to EPOLLOUT?  If I am send out a 
> large buffer and incoming data wants to stream in on a full duplex 
> connection, what happens to that data when I am processing the socket 
> while it is in epollout mode?  
> 
> Is the following accurate?  When data comes in while I am sending, I guess 
> the data fills up the receive buffers until they are full and then it 
> stops accepting data until it is cleared out?  When I switch back to 
> EPOLLIN, I'm guessing that I will get a notification on that fd that there 
> is data waiting.
> 
> The other question I have is there a way to do full-duplex networking so 
> that I can receive network messages while I am sending or vice versa?  It 
> seems that the method of switching the socket between EPOLLIN and EPOLLOUT 
> means that I can't do both operations simultaneously.  Thanks

I don't quite follow. You shouldn't be switching back and forth if 
you're trying to both send and receive, you can be registered for both 
notifications at the same time and respond to whatever notifications 
that you get. If you're not trying to write anything at the moment then 
you shouldn't be registered for EPOLLOUT though, same for reading and 
EPOLLIN.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/