Johannes Weiner wrote:
quoted text
> Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:
> 
>> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> raw1394_ioctl() doing usercopy under fi->state_mutex
>>> raw1394_mmap() taking fi->state_mutex under mmap_sem
...
quoted text
>> was the usage of mmap_sem changed after 2.6.27 or were my tests
>> insufficient?
> 
> In linux-next/-mm, copy_to/from_user have lockdep annotations telling
> that they might fault and therefor acquire the mmap_sem in #PF.
> 
> But since faults on ioctl parameters are so rare, without these
> annotations you would probably never see a warning.

Thanks for the report and explanation.  I logged this as 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11823 (dv1394, won't fix) and 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824 (raw1394, to be fixed 
in the 2.6.28-rc timeframe since it is a post 2.6.27 regression).
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =-=- ==--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/