Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 11:10 am

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:


This is == OO_MASK right? Otherwise things will break when we change 
OO_SHIFT.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Oct 22, 9:18 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 9:28 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 10:47 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:03 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:24 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:45 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:49 am)