On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:47 -0700, Larry Finger wrote:
> 
> > When a utility starts spitting messages that it doesn't understand what the
> > kernel is providing _AND_ the commit message does not mention that this will
> > happen, can someone be blamed for thinking it is a bug?
> 
> Heh, no, not really. It was fairly obvious us, but I guess we were just
> routine-blinded.
> 
> > Clearly this is not a regression. Are there plans to update the wireless utilities?
> 
> I suspect it could just be made to ignore them. Or skip a select few,
> but obviously it will never be able to parse all of them...
> 
> johannes

	Hi,

	If you want me to understand what it's about, you may want to
give me a bit more context.
	Alternatively, just send me a patch for Wireless Tools, and
I'll put it in the next release. Wireless Tools is still maintained
and I still do releases, even if I don't put much cycles into it.
	Have a great day...

	Jean

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/