Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 9:35 am

[Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:28:14AM -0700]

I supposed it would mean maximum object number inside page (ie quantity) which
is happen to be the same value as OO_MASK. Maybe OO_MAX_OBJ?

		- Cyrill -
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Oct 22, 9:18 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 9:28 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Oct 22, 9:35 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 10:47 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:03 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:24 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:45 am)
Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 22, 11:49 am)