Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Howells
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 3:23 pm

Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:


It's not an outright improvement.  shmem.o is still larger than tiny-shmem.o,
albeit not a lot; however, some embedded people really do count the bytes.


Ummm...  It seems to be.  I think it used to be used by SYSV SHM.  Certainly
deleting that function causes no link problems.

David
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, Matt Mackall, (Tue Sep 30, 4:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, David Howells, (Wed Oct 1, 8:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, Hugh Dickins, (Wed Oct 1, 11:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 1, 10:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, Matt Mackall, (Thu Oct 2, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, David Howells, (Thu Oct 2, 3:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem, Matt Mackall, (Thu Oct 2, 3:44 pm)