Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel Walker
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 12:04 pm

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:


Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation without
the insults for once?


The very fact that you mention it in your release notes .. You mention
the type of system in "preempt-rt" and the advantage of your system..


The fact that a direct relationship exists means that any threaded
interrupt system needs to take into account the inevitable connection to
real time since it will be used in that system as a core component.. If
you can't effectively achieve real time with your system , than that's a
problem that needs to be addressed. 

Daniel

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threade ..., Daniel Walker, (Thu Oct 2, 12:04 pm)
[RFC patch] genirq threading for ehci, ohci and uhci USB hosts, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich, (Mon Oct 20, 6:32 pm)
Re: [RFC patch] genirq threading (v2) for ehci, ohci and u ..., Sven-Thorsten Dietrich, (Tue Oct 21, 3:29 am)